About Embassy


Established on : June 1956

First Ambassador :  HE Awad Satti

The Sudanese Embassy in London A Short History of a Long and enduring Friendship Sudan declared independence peacefully after a vote in parliament on 19 December 1955. Read More

  • image
  • image
  • image

H.E. Ambassador Mohammed Abdalla Ali Eltom

"Mr. Eltom has been in the Foreign Service for nearly 28 years. "He served in various regions in the world where he held positions in Sudan Embassies in the Middle East in Amman-Jordan, Damascus-Syria and Abu-Dhabi-UAE.".

"He then served in Sudan’s Embassy in Washington DC where he was selected by the Foreign Ministry to be within the diplomatic staff that re-inaugurated the Embassy after a period of closure."

H.E. Ambassador Mohamed Abdallah Ali Eltom

"Having served in London before as a Deputy Ambassador provided"Mr. Eltom with deep insights about different aspects of life in the UK.".

"Prior to being appointed as Sudan’s Ambassador to the United Kingdom, Mr. Eltom assumed the role of Head of American Affairs Department at the Foreign Ministry in Sudan."

Direct Communication channel with H.E. Ambassador Mohamed Abdallah Ali Eltom

"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam."dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.".

"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur."

RokSprocket is a versatile content extension with a custom UI.

The Tabs layout mode features an image based navigation system.

Sudan Facilitates Delivery of Humanitarian Aid to South Sudan

The Sudanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs appreciates the joint statement by the Troika countries on 6th March, in which the three countries; Norway, UK and USA, welcomed Sudanese Government  opening of border crossings with South Sudan for delivery of humanitarian assistance to the needy people in South Sudan. The statement appreciated further hosting of over 360.000 South Sudanese refugees in Sudan, and the decision of Sudan Government to donate food assistance from its food reserves to South Sudan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs takes this opportunity to reiterate the Government of Sudan's moral commitment to the welfare and stability of the brotherly South Sudanese people and reaffirms the determination to persist in its efforts in the interest of achieving security and stability in South Sudan.

The Spokesperson, Khartoum

10 April 2017









Below is the Troika’s statement of 6th April 2017: 

Troika welcomes the opening of a border crossing from Sudan     to South Sudan to allow humanitarian food assistance to reach   areas suffering from famine and severe food insecurity.

The members of the Troika (Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States) welcome the Government of Sudan’s opening of the border crossing into Bentiu, in South Sudan, for the    delivery   of humanitarian food assistance to areas gravely affected by the conflict and suffering from famine  and severe food insecurity. This border crossing will allow for a second access route for emergency food assistance, along with the already open Kosti - Renk river corridor. The Troika also recognizes the Government of Sudan’s efforts to facilitate the flow of food assistance through Port Sudan.

The Troika notes Sudan has accepted over 365,000 South Sudanese refugees, including more than 60,000 South Sudanese who have entered Sudan in the first three months of 2017, and encourages the government to ensure continued humanitarian access to these refugee communities. The Troika also welcomes the Sudanese government’s decision to donate food from their own food reserves to people in need in South Sudan.

The Troika calls on the Government of South Sudan to coordinate with the World Food Program and partners providing vital assistance. The Troika urges the government and all armed groups to allow full and safe humanitarian access to reach communities in need, and to ensure that food and other commodities are not diverted from the intended beneficiaries. 

The Troika recommends the opening of additional land and water routes between Sudan and South Sudan so that communities in both countries can benefit from open trade and the efficient and swift movement of humanitarian goods and personnel.

Dr. Khalid Al Mubarak Column

Khartoum Forum on Role of Media in Combating Terrorism

Date: 23/08/2016

The status of the Sudan as one of the most stable countries in a turbulent region was consolidated last week with its choice as a venue for the Arab League's Forum on the Role of Media in Combating Terrorism. The timely event on (18-19 August) was addressed by both the First Vice President, in the opening session, and President Bashir in the closing session. The Arab League was represented by its deputy Secretary General Ahmed Ibn Hilli who ...

Read More


Stuck on Washington's Blacklist

Widely known for the humanitarian crisis in Darfur, where government forces over a little more than a decade have been implicated in the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of people, Sudan has largely fallen out of international headlines as other crises have demanded diplomatic attention. Sudanese President Omar Bashir stands accused in the International Criminal Court for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Conflict in the western region of the country remains, as does fighting in the southern provinces of South Kordofan and Blue Nile. The government has been accused of obstructing the peace process and of complicity in the death of thousands of civilians caught in the crossfire of its bombing campaign against rebel groups.President Barack Obama's foreign policy has been marked by detente with longtime U.S. foes like Cuba and Iran. But one country has not benefited from Obama's penchant for diplomatic re-engagement over continued isolation: Sudan. And now the northeast African nation is pressing its case on its own.


But the country's representatives insist none of that translates to involvement in international terrorism.

Maowia Khalid, the Sudanese charge d'affaires in Washington, complains that his country remains on the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism, even though it addressed U.S. concerns about Sudan's involvement in international terror. He says internal unrest is no justification for U.S. policy toward his country – which he denies sponsors terror – and says there is a "double standard" when it comes to Sudan.

"We get so cooperative with Washington on combating terrorism in the region and globally and yet we are still on that list," Khalid tells U.S. News. "Washington is linking the list of state sponsor of terrorism with the internal political situation inside Sudan. "

On the terrorism list since 1993, when the U.S. State Department accused the government of harboring Osama bin Laden and supporting al Qaeda, the country faces a slew of financial sanctions that have led to its isolation from the international economy, with no access to credit and foreign investment. It has also suffered economically following the independence of South Sudan, with the new nation formed in 2011 claiming the majority of oil reserves as part of its territory.

The Sudanese government contends that it remains on the list despite repeated promises by the U.S. it would be removed if it met certain conditions. Each time, Sudan says, the U.S. has reneged on those promises, leaving the country blacklisted for over two decades.

It's a tricky situation for the United States. The government has offered little proof it thinks Sudan still backs terrorism, but bestowing what could be construed as any type of reward on the pariah regime approaches political impossibility, particularly in an election season.

Each year, the State Department must present Congress with a report on terrorist activities of other countries, and the report released last year on Sudan was filled with complimentary language about its cooperation with U.S. authorities in fighting terrorism. But the findings did not merit the country's removal from the list.

The State Department found that in 2014 "Sudan remained a generally cooperative partner of the United States on counterterrorism. During the past year, the Government of Sudan continued to support counterterrorism operations to counter threats to U.S. interests and personnel in Sudan." It also acknowledged that Sudan has "taken steps to limit the activities of these elements and has worked to disrupt foreign fighters' use of Sudan as a logistics base and transit point for terrorists going to Syria and Iraq."

The discrepancy is not lost on observers.

"I'm not an apologist for the regime or justifying everything it does – most certainly not. But even the State Department doesn't try to say that it's a state sponsor of terror," says J. Peter Pham, director of the Africa Center at the Atlantic Council. "It's an absurdity. Whatever they may be, whether one choses to characterize them as an authoritarian regime, lack of democracy, lack of respect for human rights – all of which are important concerns – but whatever they are, a state sponsor is clearly not what they are."

The State Department did not respond to requests for comment.

Similar criticisms were lodged about the State Department's designation of Cuba as a sponsor of terror for 33 years. Based on its ties to a leftist Colombian revolutionary movement and Basque separatists, the communist country carried the classification for decades with observers regarding it as a political punishment for domestic human rights violations despite scant evidence of participation in terrorist activity.

Obama restored diplomatic relations with Cuba after over 50 years of isolation, removing it from the list of terror sponsors in May and opening an embassy in Havana last summer at a ceremony attended by Secretary of State John Kerry. The president will make a historic trip to the island next month.

Also last year, the Obama administration achieved a landmark nuclear deal with Iran, requiring the Islamic Republic to relinquish its nuclear capabilities in exchange for relief from crippling economic sanctions. Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif speak regularly and have a close personal relationship forged during the yearslong negotiations.

While the Obama administration claims neither Cuba nor Iran are absolved of all their sins, it has determined that a fractured relationship with imperfect regimes serves U.S. interests better than no ties at all. Iran remains on the state sponsor of terrorism list and still doesn't have an embassy in the U.S., but diplomatic channels that had been closed since the Iranian revolution now allow for regular communication at high levels. Sudan receives no such attention.

Khalid called U.S.-Sudan relationship "one of the most promising [and] cooperative" in the region until the early 1990s when his country was put on the list.

"We try our best to cooperate and to work together with the United States," Khalid says. "We exerted all our efforts to try to normalize this relation[ship]. The demands remain from Washington, 'Go and make peace inside Sudan, and then we'll normalize these relations.'"

In fact, the Sudanese diplomat blames some of the continued unrest on the state sponsor of terrorism sanctions and additional punishments imposed by the U.S.

"As long as these sanctions are there, peace cannot prevail completely in Sudan," Khalid says. "Most of the problems in Sudan are problems of lack of development, of people sometimes confronting each other because they are fighting to get very scarce resources that they are sharing with each other."

The Sudanese government has been accused of embezzling billions in public oil profits. Although the majority of the oil is now found in South Sudan, that country must pay its northern neighbor to transit its oil to ports on the coast of Sudan, revenue the two countries have agreed to peg to record low prices. The U.N. says the regime also misuses the country's mineral deposits, including gold in Darfur. A 2013 report from the Enough Project found that the government's interest in the region "and corresponding role in spurring violence in the area" fits the pattern of employing sectarian groups "as tools for consolidating economic control and power."

Sudan is ranked "not free" by the U.S. government-funded watchdog organization Freedom House, which monitors the status of human rights and political freedom around the world. It does not have a free press, and "continues to forcibly suppress dissent and undermine citizens' right to assemble," according to a Freedom House statement following an incident last week.

Pham says that in 2010 Kerry, then chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, promised the Sudanese that, were they to allow the southern part of the country to hold a referendum on independence, Sudan would be removed from the list. But Pham says by the time independence was approved and South Sudan became its own nation, ending the over 20-year civil war, the U.S. was gearing up for the 2012 election and there was no political appetite for removing Sudan from the list.

"We've repeatedly done this moving the goalpost. I see both sides. I see their frustration," Pham says. "The best way to describe their listing on the state sponsor of terrorism designation is anachronistic."

The Obama administration has much the same aversion to stirring the pot by moving to delist Sudan during a contentious election and amid continued criticism of his dealing with both Cuba and Iran. But Khalid, who declined to comment on the U.S. presidential race, says it is at the United States' own peril that it eschews closer relations with his country, which has grown closer to Russia and China instead.

"In this world there is no vacuum," the Sudanese diplomat says.

Although the Obama administration has yet to extend an olive branch to Sudan, Khalid is not bitter the U.S. has drawn closer to Iran, or that Cuba has been removed from the list.

"It means basically the hope is there. The international arena, it could be changed at any point. We will not lose hope of being [off] of that list. We will not lose hope of the sanctions being removed from Sudan. And we will not lose hope of bringing the relations between Sudan and United States to normal level," Khalid says. "We are still hoping that the change [that] happened to Cuba and Iran also could happen to Sudan at any point. We [are] going to work tirelessly to reach such [a] point."

Login Form